Author | Post | |||
Erik![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi, you know TheBlacksheep replaced the @'s in the email-addresses with "(a.t)" to make life harder for any programs walking through the web gathering email-addresses. Well I just read about something and I think it's really good. The addresses could simply be printed in html-unicodes which are at most the same probability of being known to such a spider as the "(a.t)" is. I think it's even more safe. And in the end the address get's displayed correctly and also in a link this can be used. I just wanted to ask if anyone has a problem with that. bye, Erik ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
|||
Erik![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
|||
Erik![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now it's updated ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
|||
Erik![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
|||
r3d5pik3![]() ![]() |
w00ter woot |
|||
![]() |
|
|||
pjsk8![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I doubt anyone had noticed, but mine never changed for some reason. I had noticed it on everyone elses but mine. Weird.....I've noticed a lot of weird little things haven't I? |
|||
![]() |
|
|||
Erik![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
|||
pjsk8![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's sort of like a cheer I guess.....if you wanna call it that. |
|||
![]() |
|