Topic: "Ranking : new ordering" (page 2 of 2)

< 1 2
Author Post
pjsk8
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Yes I agree. The person who was on that rank first should STAY on that rank. The other would just have to settle for the next rank.
private message
paralax
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
That was very noble of you to say that ray. Even if it bumps you out of number 1 spot.

Thank you very much.

And yes, this is what I intended, and many other sites follow the same format.
private message EMail Website
rayden5
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Hey Para,

np, iam honest you know ;) Anyway i will get you...sooner or later...we both know *hehe*

Ray
private message
occasus
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
If I may add my opinion I think it would be more equal if the ranking order were so that if I solved 103 challs and other 3 people had solved 103 challs then the total 4 people should be at the same position!!

Even if 1 solved a chall before another is not right, because there are to take into consideration the Subscribing Date!
private message Website
pjsk8
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Yes that is very true.
private message
occasus
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Ty pjsk8 LOL finally with all my posts somebody agreed with me LOL
private message Website
pjsk8
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Well, I had thought this way before, but then I started thinking, "Well, I got to this spot first, so it should rightfully be mine." Then, I started thinking about how unfair it would be for someone who signed up not so long ago, but is a hard worker, only to be set 1 rank down due to some old user who hasn't solved any challs within a couple of months. Am I right? I think that makes sense.
private message
pjsk8
groupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmastergroupmaster
Wait, but then for the activeusers, if you ranked people with the same challs as the same rank, who would come first? I think it would be the person who was originally on that spot, but they would both be ranked the same. Just a small thought.
private message

Topic: "Ranking : new ordering" (page 2 of 2)

< 1 2